Food 1
Salmon
Fish · Raw, Atlantic farmed
208kcal
Calories
20.4g
Protein
0.0g
Carbohydrates
13.4g
Fat
Loading...
Nutrition comparison
Salmon vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
A fair side-by-side view using standardized values per 100 grams. Preparation states are shown when available, and values are sourced from the USDA FoodData Central.
At a glance
Tuna (Canned in Water) is the lower-calorie option at 116 kcal per 100 g; Salmon has 92 more kcal per 100 g. Tuna (Canned in Water) provides the most protein at 25.5 g per 100 g. Salmon is higher in fat at 13.4 g per 100 g, which can matter for calorie density. Use the serving calculator on each food page to match the comparison to your actual portion.
Change this comparison
Food 2
Tuna (Canned in Water)
Fish
116kcal
Calories
25.5g
Protein
0.0g
Carbohydrates
0.8g
Fat
Direct comparison
What is actually different?
Calories
Salmon is 79% higher
Salmon
208kcal
Tuna (Canned in Water)
116kcal
Protein
Tuna (Canned in Water) is 25% higher
Salmon
20.4g
Tuna (Canned in Water)
25.5g
Carbohydrates
The values are equal
Salmon
0.0g
Tuna (Canned in Water)
0.0g
Fat
Salmon is 1575% higher
Salmon
13.4g
Tuna (Canned in Water)
0.8g
Use the numbers for your goal
Compare the standardized per-100 g values first, then choose the serving size that matches your meal and overall calorie or macro target.
Scale the real portion
These values are per 100g. Open either food to calculate the amount you actually plan to eat.
Take your target with you
Turn today’s estimate into an everyday habit.
Log meals, check your macros, and stay close to your daily targets with Lilbite’s simple food tracker on iOS and Android.
Fast food loggingDaily macro progressSimple meal history
